On the Palestinian Right of Return and UNRWA funding Craig Turner, 14 May 2024 -- Before the Second World War, there were significant populations of ethnic Germans living in regions outside of Germany across eastern europe. These were families who spoke German but had not lived in territorial Germany, often for generations. These people bore no responsibility for the war. In the aftermath of the war, twelve million ethnic Germans were expelled from their lands, or otherwise compelled to flee. These people suffered injustice. There is no pattern of terrorist activity by displaced ethnic Germans against modern states where their ancestors were removed from their land. In 1948, some 700k Palestinian arabs were displaced in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Arab nations joined the war against the Jewish cause, but were unsuccessful. The outcome of the war was the formation of the nation of Israel, and the permanent displacement of those arabs who had moved out of the territory that was now Israel during the conflict. The arab world did not accept the result of that war, and launched follow-up wars in 1967 and 1973. In each case, Israel won decisively. Though some arab states have made their peace with Israel since then, several others and Iran continue to fund military and terrorist activity against Israel. [1] In 1949, the UN set up the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) to assist displaced Palestinians adjust to new circumstances. It has failed to achieve its mission, and has been compromised by activist capture - employees who operate on the basis of their personal political agendas rather than being guided by the mission of the entity. Seventy five years after the 1948 war, it is common for Palestinian political organisations and the UNRWA to claim a /right of return/ for Palestinian arabs to lands that now reside in territorial Israel. The origins of this phrase are complicated [2], but it has become a form of weasel words that implicitly deny Israeli sovereignty. The country that existed before the 1948 war was the British-run Mandatory Palestine. That arrangement ceased in 1948. More than half of Mandatory Palestine was replaced by the state of Israel, with the remaining land becoming the Palestinian territories with complex sovereignty split between Israel, UN NGOs and local Palestinian leaders. There is an analogy between this change of land control, and European border changes after the Second World War. The right-of-return mantra discourages Palestinian arabs from accepting the reality of their circumstances, and incites conflict. For decades the western world has poured money into the Palestinian territories with a stated goal of helping the Palestinian arabs to emerge from poverty and to form a respectable state. The Palestinian people at large experience poor value from this funding. The funds are routinely lost to corruption. For the last twenty years the groups that control Gaza have been directing donations intended for nation-building towards terrorism. There is a moral imperative not to fund terrorism. Western nations should require organisations operating in the region to explicitly reject the right-of-return and to recognise the state of Israel as a condition of receiving aid. We should view this as a litmus test for the amount of damage that Israel is justified in bringing to Hamas and its sympathisers in the current Israel-Hamas war. The job is not done until it is possible for organisations that explicitly reject the right-of-return to operate unhindered across Gaza and the West Bank. -- [1] There has been a slow momentum towards arab states forming non-hostile relations with Israel. Relations with Egypt became stable in the 1970s, and Jordan in the 1980s. Iraq has not antagonised Israel since the Hussein regime collapse in 2003. Syria and the defacto government of South Lebanon continue to organise attacks on Israel, as does the Persian state of Iran. These regimes routinely offer lip service to Palestinian causes (e.g. motions at the United Nation), but none currently offer resettlement options for Palestinian arabs. There are large populations of Palestinian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. In Syria they have the same rights as Syrian citizens (for whatever that is worth), but inferior rights to citizens in Jordan and Lebanon. [2] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_194